Archive for the ‘Global Politics’ Category

Sixty-Six Years Later; The Unlearnt Lesson!

May 10, 2011 3 comments

The soldiers hear that Hitler has been killed and there is a somewhat stunned, somewhat confused pause.  Then one of the soldiers ask the question that everyone is wondering: “Is the war over?”

The answer, of course, is “No.”

Still, there was a feeling of, the tide has turned.

Not being a professional historian, I embark on the following composition with ridiculing levels of bravery and fortitude. The task at hand?…to illuminate on the death of Osama bin Laden but perhaps furthermore to shed light on the sheer brilliance exhibited by the infamous comparison drawn between that of Adolf Hitler and Osama bin Laden.

In their new issue which hit stands Thursday May 5th, 2011, Time has emulated their famous cover from May 7th, 1945 with a similar picture marking the death of Osama Bin Laden…a bit of stretch? I think not…

Adolf Hitler, has been often cited (and perceived) to immaculately serve as a brand for violence and torture; a name that continues to ignite the brain of all those who re-visit his time of reign. Even after his demise present day academia continues to project forth the vitality behind Hitler’s strategic execution and success in instilling fear within the masses. Could it be that some sense of glory and praise is exhibited when considering such academic formulations surrounding the existence and governance of Adolf Hitler?

Adolf Hitler or the incarnation of absolute evil; this is how generations will reflect on the all-powerful Führer of the criminal Third Reich. When compared, his peers Mussolini and Franco were novices. Under his hypnotic gaze, humanity migrated towards a threshold from which one could see the abyss.

When considering Osama Bin Laden he terrorized his adversaries, he knew how to please, impress and charm the very interlocutors from whom he wanted support (very much like Hitler). Diplomats and journalists insist as much on his charm as they do on his temper tantrums. Osama’s political and strategic ambitions have created a dividing line within this turbulent and tormented century which in itself is undeniable: there is a before and an after however. By the breadth of his crimes, which have attained a quasi-ontological dimension, he surpasses all his predecessors (almost).

To further continue, President Obama, in his address to the international community (confirming Osama Bin Laden’s death) provided an operative platform for his audiences to reflect on any imagery that could/can be related to that of the times of Hitler and Bin Laden. If one continues to operate on such a spectrum can it be suggested that Obama’s address confirms the very notion of a) The United States of America inevitably confirming to its fear of the symbol of that of Osama Bin Laden and b) that because the USA’s role in World War II was jingoistic in nature that in fact their role in the War against Terror (and specifically against Osama Bin Laden) was indeed pugnacious yet again?!

There are paramount differences however when considering the role of the US in the War against Terror and that of Hitler’s time. The US did not provide Hitler with weapons to fight. Osama Bin Laden never came close to genocide, the freedoms ‘lost’ through this process (or as some would put it the ones Bin Laden took away) will still be lacking and most important (for all imperialist bafoons hold your breath as the following might give you a nose bleed) Al – Qaeda is not done-yet!

On the topic of evil charisma (as so many put it) former New Jersey Governor Tom Kean, who was the co-chairman of the 9/11 commission said “I viewed him as a charismatic figure,” in an interview with New Jersey Network.

Mark Stern, professor emeritus of Iona College in New York and an expert in the psychology of evil and Messianic figures, believes bin Laden was similar yet difference from other evil charismatics, such as Adolph Hitler.

“He had more of a political world view — more like a desire to save the world than to destroy it and rebuild it in his image,” said Stern.

He was a “witness” to the fundamental cause. “The message found him,” said Stern. “He didn’t find the message.”

Former President George W. Bush called them the “evil-doers” — who wield mesmerizing power over their devoted followers and often possess qualities of grandiosity and charisma becoming agents of influence.

Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel ruminated on the same question when he analyzed Hitler: “How did this unstable paranoid find it within himself to impose gigantic hope as an immutable ideal that motivated his nation almost until the end?”

“The fact is that Hitler was beloved by his people…who pledged to him affection, a tenderness and a fidelity that bordered on the irrational. Osama bin Laden was no different”

The Osama Bin Laden fiasco has become nothing more than an exhaustive list of avenues being resorted to for the perpetuation of ignorance amongst the masses and that of the ‘informed’ reader.

After over a decade-long search, the Obama administration is pompous over the murder of the Western world’s most wanted terrorist, Osama bin Laden, making him the third Reagan-supported criminal (after Saddam Hussein and Augusto Pinochet) to die since the turn of this century. As the United States gloats over the death of its staunchest enemy and steals the world media’s attention from the bloody protests in Syria and Yemen, the crackdown of the Israeli Blockade on Gaza, the flourishing of 21st century fascism and erosion of children/women rights in the Middle East (alluding to a very few of course!)

I end with the words of Mark Stern.

…Thousands will succeed him.”


Anti-Muslim Rhetoric in the U.S – Is this your idea of Democracy?

March 12, 2011 Leave a comment

 As a matter of fact, I know quite a few marines who will be willing to help these terrorists to an early meeting in paradise.- At Orange County Hate Rally, GOP Councilwoman Says She Wants Marines To Send Muslim Families To ‘Paradise’

“The most popular name in the United Kingdom this year for babies was Mohammed, am I racist to think that I’m alarmed by that? Because I am…’ –Bill Mayer

“Islam is a violent religion, no wait I can’t say religion, political system. Islam is a violent political system bent on the overthrow of the government and world domination.” -Pat Roberson, television evangelist.

For the first time in US history, at least 15 states have either approved or introduced bills banning Shariah Law this week. These very bills could present themselves to consider fasting and praying a crime for Muslims in the U.S. In Tennessee a Muslim could potentially face up to 15 years in jail for praying 5 times a day, fasting or even donating to charity as it would be defined as engaging in practices that are ‘shariah law’ hence forbidden to do as such according to the proposed unconstitutional and congressional hearings chaired by none other than Peter King, the republican representative.

Sheikh Hamza Yusuf, Islamic scholar, convert and co-founder of Zaytuna College in Berkley, California states that there is  ‘immense misunderstanding of Shariah Law’ within the U.S and further notes that ‘the Shariah Law is of no threat to the U.S.’

Have Muslims replaced the cold war communist boogie man in the american psyche? Why is Islam still considered to encompass attributes of pre-modern conceptions and why have such understandings become normative in places like the U.S?

Revolution vs. Revolt vs. Trend

March 2, 2011 1 comment

With all of the upheavals surrounding the ‘revolutionary’ wave throughout the Middle East I’m taken back by the overly optimistic reactions that everyone around me is submersed in. Revolution! Revolution! is all I have seen in the papers, within dialogues and engagements as well as within any and all topics of discussion yet the simple question must be asked…

Does one know the difference between that of a ‘revolution’ and ‘revolt/uprise’? The systemic difference and overthrow of a governmental STRUCTURE  is vital for a revolution to be considered as such. Do you see examples of such a manifestation to date? or are we simply expressing jubilant tendencies and hope towards yet another revolt where the uprise and mobilization of the masses has ignited hope and the idea of conquer within us. The triumphs of that of the Egyptian people has become a milestone when considering the level of activism and participatory engagement on behalf of the Egyptian people who cannot be in any way discounted. However, media outlets I feel are inaccurate in classifying such to be a ‘Revolution’ as this is merely the beginning.  World leaders are continuing to resort to the word ‘Revolution’ in defining the happenings in Egypt, and strategically so. By doing so, they are once again pursuing the masses to believe that their word indeed is done!

Moreover, I continue to be bombarded with headlines infiltrated with whats next for Libya, the question of Yemen, the secretive advancements in the relationship between Bahrain and Israel and more importantly of who’s next in line for the wave of revolution I can’t help but notice the downsize in coverage and discussion reflecting on Egypt? It’s almost as if it was an overnight miracle and now poof….GONE! Egypt who?

Which brings me to my next point…The Generating of Political ‘Trends.’

The manner in which, we, as passive consumers, engage with the daily news (via newspapers, news channels, online articles and other various media outlets etc), its seems to be parallel, and does mimic, the way we behave as shoppers within the market. As a consumer, there is continuous hunger that is looking forward to the next big thing. The next ‘in fashion’ item or the next ‘trend.’ As a result retailers and furthermore the manufacturing machine of that of Capitalism caters to our need and continues to keep the human mind boggled from always wanting more…always wanting to partake in the ‘trend’ that is operative at that moment.

Ever consider the similarity between that and the generating of political stories as ‘trends.’ If so can one suggest than that the geographical importance that is in the limelight presently and the unfolding taking place within the Middle East will soon be replaced by the next big thing? Consider the entities that generate such political trends and  consider what lies behind such manifestations.

Newspaper readers, the international community and the average citizen seems to have already moved on beyond Egypt…and soon enough will advance to focus on yet another political ‘trend’ or story. Could it be that the generating of such political events is to merely cater to the human mind as it seeks boredom, unable to accumulate much thought towards a single issue? If so, than the story / ‘trend’ is not of importance but rather the occurring and unfolding of one; whatever it may encompass.

…consumerism prevails! One point for Capitalism.

%d bloggers like this: